PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ben Balzer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:51:05 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (145 lines)
http://www.panix.com/~paleodiet/losspts.txt has many answers to these
questions. If you follow that advice you'll know more than 99% of
osteoporosis patients (and many physicians!).

Calcium loss is often a slow process, and Calcium regain is hard to achieve
and always slow- normally physicians count it as a success if they can
simply stop further calcium loss. If you actually gain bone density (usually
takes 12-18 months to see a change), you're in the lucky few. Actual gain in
bone density is the holy grail of osteoporosis therapy- not yet achieved
despite the claims of some drug companies.

Cortisone REPLACEMENT therapy for Addison's disease shouldn't necessarily
cause osteoporosis if you're not over-replaced (ie only receiving
physiological doses like 25mg hydrocortisone/day)(equivalent to wht normal
people's adrenal glands make. Over-replacement of thyroid hormone erodes
bone density- so perfect balance (euthyroid) is best. Follow your doctors's
recommendations on these critical hormones.

By looking after your lifestyle so carefully, you have a very big advantage.
Be patient, repeat your bone mineral density test each 12-18 months.

Ben Balzer



----- Original Message -----
From: Ingrid Bauer <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [P-F] Loren Cordain


> >The Paleolithic Diet and Its Modern Implications is an Interview with
Loren
> >Cordain, PhD done by Robert Crayhon, MS (both, by astonishing
coincidence,
> >members of our little group).  The interview is at:
> >
> >  http://www.lifeservices.com/cordain.htm
> from the interview :, some questions came in my mind
> >Loren Cordain: Epidemiological studies have suggested that increased
animal
> protein intake is associated with higher rates of osteoporotic fracture,
and
> many metabolic trails have demonstrated increased urinary calcium losses
> with increased protein intake. However, in order to firmly establish cause
> and effect, and hence proof, that a certain variable is responsible for a
> certain effect, scientists conduct intervention trails. To my knowledge
> intervention studies have not been able to show that a change from
> low/moderate to high protein intake increases that rate of kidney stones
or
> bone loss in either humans or animals. >
>
> what is intervention trials?
> i started to eat more animals over a year ago, and a bone density test
> showed fragile spine and to a lesser extent, legs too. I am taking
cortisone
> for 19 years, ( good enough reason to to have osteoporosis) but i am
getting
> lot of fruits and vegetables, sunshine, and plenty of exercices (obviously
> it was not enough to compensate the side effect of cortisone therapy).
> I didn't have bone density done before augmenting my animal intake, so i
am
> not in mesure to interepret those fact one way or an other, but it make me
> doubt about eating more animals.
>
> loren Corain interview continue...
> <Stone age diets clearly were characterized by extremely high protein
> intakes by modern standards, yet bone robusticity and density (determined
> from fossil paleolithic humans) were greater than or equal to that of most
> modern humans despite the total absence of dairy products in stone age
> diets. This seeming paradox (low calcium intake, high protein intake yet
> strong dense bones) may probably be explained by multiple factors. Stone
age
> humans were more active than modern people and consequently the everyday
> work they did resulted in greater bone loading, which in turn can
influence
> bone density. Further, they lived outside most of the day so their
sunshine
> exposure and hence vitamin D status would likely have been superior to
most
> modern people who work indoors and get little sunshine exposure.
>
> Lastly, and most importantly, the critical dietary factor influencing bone
> metabolism and hence osteoporosis is not calcium intake, nor calcium
> excretion, but rather calcium balance. The acid base status of the total
> diet rather than calcium intake or excretion determines calcium balance
> (Barzel US. The skeleton as an ion exchange: implications for the role of
> acid-base imbalance in the genesis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res.
1995;
> 10: 1431-36). Foods which yield a net acidic load mainly as sulfates and
> phosphates cause the kidneys to respond to this dietary acid challenge
with
> net acid excretion, as well as ammonium and titratable acid excretion.
> Concurrently, the skeleton supplies buffer by active resorption of bone.
> Consequently, calciuria is directly related to net acid excretion (Barzel
> US, Massey LK Excess dietary protein can adversely affect bone. J Nutr
1998;
> 128:1051-53). Foods which cause a net acid excretion include meat, fish,
> cheeses and grains (Remer T, et al. Potential renal acid loads of foods
and
> its influence on urine pH. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jul; 95: 791-97). Fruits
> and vegetables have a net alkaline value and consequently reduce acid
> excretion and hence reduce calciuria thereby halting bone resorption and
> actually allowing bone accretion to occur. Although the dietary calcium to
> protein ration in stone age diets would have been quite low, the large
> amount of fruits and vegetables (35% of total energy) included in the diet
> would have produced a net dietary acid-base status which would have
favored
> bone accretion even in the face of enormous protein intakes.
>
> Similarly, nephro and urolithiiasis would have been reduced from the high
> levels of fruit and vegetable consumption via their ability to reduce the
> potential renal acid load.
>
> like i said i ate lot of fruits and vegetables, no grains or dairy , 2 to
4
> meals a week with animals, for 10 years (before i was heavy,  grain and
> dairy eater), for one year now i am eating less fruits ,little more
> vegetables of  and 1 meal a day animals products. Before this last year my
> body was certainly on the alcaline side and must still be well balanced ,
> acid alcaline wise , but i am loosing my bones any way ( and teeths from
my
> opinion,  despite the fact i am told by specialists that osteoporosis
don't
> affect teeths).
> does  cortisone will affect my acid alcaline balance, rendering all those
> fruits and vegetables, sunshine and exercises worthless ?
> i need some more clues about this relationship between animal proteins and
> calcium  (how the paradox of hunter gatherers bone density can be
explained
> more?)
> About trials , it is for years that i will be willing to be part of a
study
> on autoimmune processes and diet, i would like to be followed in my
> experiments with diets to deal with my condition (smith syndrome ,(addison
+
> hypothyroidy)). I would like to be connected with searchers instead of MD
>  I AM TIRED of MD inertia and conservative approach who go by their
> textbook,instead of seeing that , because of my  " healthy" life style  i
> don't fit in their frame of references ) all studies being done with
cooked
> food or and grain dairy eaters.
> Jean-claude

ATOM RSS1 RSS2