Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:00:47 +1100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This chlorine is not absorbed, but normal Chloride ion can be harmful- the
chloride in salt is harmful, not just the sodium. I quote Loren Cordain:
"As you may know its not just the Na ion, but the
accompanying Cloride ion which also wreaks havoc via its acidifying effect.
If you are unfamiliar with the acid/base concept of stone age nutrition,
you should read Remer and Manz, J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:791-7"
Ben Balzer
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, 5 January 2000 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: [P-F] chlorine-
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, S.B. Feldman wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 1/4/00 4:01:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>
> > I also find splenda to be my preferred low-carbohydrate sweetener, I
know how
> > it is made and do not find that objectionable. There is plenty of Cl in
the
> > body, as a matter of fact we make hydrochloric acid which is absolutely
> > necessary for digestive processes.
>
> I have not tried the stuff, but I gather from what I have read
> that the chlorine in the altered sucrose molecule is what makes
> it impervious to our sucrase enzymes. That chlorine, therefore,
> is excreted and not released in the body as an unstable ion.
>
> Todd Moody
> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|