RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
robert ratliff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:34:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Kirt:
"The facts are that humans thrive on a wide variety of
diets.....Weston Price found the best health in those
people who ate the most seafood. Initially he set out
to prove vegetarian diets were the best, but he found
just the opposite. If a diet (say raw vegan) is the
most biologically appropriate, wouldn't we find that
most healthy people practiced that diet."


You either have not read price or chose to misquote him. He did not say the
healthiest people were the ones that ate seafood. He said he found pockets
of people with proper nutrition with various diets. The diets were only good
before civilization brought its processed foods to them

AND he set out to find why children's mouths were pinched and did not have
enough room for their teeth. Don't misquote to PROVE your point. It does not
work.

Robert


By the way: I read Weston Price's book from beginning
to end. Price compares people living of totally
refined crap with people of the same tribe living of a
more natural diet. Of course he will find that the
ones eating a more natural diet are much healthier.
That still doesn't mean that they wouldn't be better
of on their original diets (and preferably in their
original habitats).


I believe it does.

Robert

ATOM RSS1 RSS2