Does this (or any of your other messages) actually mean anything? If
not, why waste our time? If so, why not write in English (or French,
Spanish, Portuguese, or something else coherent that I might have at
least a chance of understanding)?
----- Original Message -----
From: Sueko Sakai <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2001 8:32 pm
Subject: Re: [CHOMSKY] is this correct or not?
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Ratibor Trivunac wrote:
>
> > > is chomsky really advocating for anarchism? or for the >anarchist?
> >
> > For both =:)
> >
> > > i'm thinking that he's for the anarchist. and i'm also saying
> to myself
> > > that in every age anarchists are needed, for if not, the king
> would still
> > > be in his counting room counting the profits from our parents'
> "blood &
> > > sweat." of course, today it's the capitalist who is in the
> counting room.
> >
> > Chomsky is alllso member of revoloutionary-syndicate called IWW
> > (www.iww.org) which is advocating for destruction of state and
> capitalist> system=anarchy...
> >
> > > saka'i
> >
> > Rata
>
> ok, and sorry for responding so late...i had to think a bit on it.
> so
> it's about socialism/communism? my problem is that our social-
> economicsystem is a big one, and i rather doubt that anarchism is
> a form of
> organiation that the mass majority fear--out of ignorance. but of
> course,isn't chomsky thinking more along the line of: we begin at
> the community
> level, then work our way towards the state.
>
> if confucius had the patience to do what needed to be done to recover
> social order in his time, i guess his way of doing it is a clue
> for our
> time? (26 yrs. after his death, confucianism).
>
> call me keiko
> i'm spiritually evolving....
>
|