Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 06:29:52 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<v01510101b475e8ca42ba@[203.17.23.126]> from "Bill Bartlett" at
Dec 9, 99 11:57:56 pm |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Any decent society would find a way through which the tens of thousands
of homeless could live in empty buildings.
wcm>
> Well, I'm with Tresy 100% on contempt for the vandals. But I wouldn't be so
> quick to condemn them for squatting empty offices. Premeditated, planned,
> vandalism, in the context of a public protest, is unforgiveably stupid. I
> have seen some feeble attempts to defend this behaviour elsewhere and have
> responded with as much patience as I could muster.
>
> But in general terms squatting empty buildings is an entirely different
> kettle of fish. A legitimate strategy which this wobbly has found quite
> effective. Dunno if I'd want to be relying on the lunatics Tresy reports on
> as my comrades in such an endeavour though.
>
> Bill Bartlett
> Bracknell tas.
>
|
|
|