I agree with DDeBar that the term genocide is being used a bit too freely. It
would be a novel form of genocide to allow a people's women, older men, and
young boys to flee with their lives.  That was not exactly the approach taken
by Hitler.  Neither, for that matter, is it the approach that has been being
taken in Africa or, closer to home, against the indigenous Mayans in Guatemala
(with longstanding U.S. assistance, training and complicity).  And what about
Operation Phoenix is Vietnam, and its full fledged form in Mai Lai (sorry if I
just remember the  horror and not the correct spelling).  So Kosovo is about
genocide is it?  Yeah, just like Desert Fox was about weapons of mass
destruction.
                                         Dan Koenig
DDeBar wrote:

> > > (1)Why can't the Serb military create mass graves right now?
> >
> > They can.  I suppose they are.  I think they have been killing since
> > before the bombing started, and I think it will be shown that the
> > killing increased when the human rights observers left.
>
> "I think"? "I suppose"? Etc.?
> I THINK that I'd want to be damned sure of the facts before I accused
> anyone of genocide. This claim provides "justification" in the minds of
> millions for the war crimes (yes, the present bombings and coming invasion
> are violations of US and international law) being committed by NATO.
>
> Don't act (even passively) before you think.
>
> DDeBar