David, I know it's bad form to quote a message in its entirety (as below).
However, I'd like to delay a response to your questions until I see whether you are
going to admonish the writer who made the comments about you, Kirt, Tom, and
whoever being "against" me.  Ganging up on someone is poor form in both sports and
newsgroups.  In other words, as silly as it sounds, if this is a fight, and it's
all of you against little old me, I'd like to know so I can choose the right size
stick to defend myself.

Also, can you first address my indignant message that directly responded to your
use of "insincerity"?

I *sincerely* need to know if we're here to struggle toward higher quality dietary
truth or if this is some forum for smartly-worded quips and sarcastic messages
intended to put disbelievers of in-house dogma in their 'place'.

Regards,
Rex Harrill
-----------------------------------------
David Mayne wrote:

> > Liza May wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I am against you.
> >
>
> Rex:
>
> > Suit yourself.  Perhaps you're aware of how I feel about dialog with possible
> > plagiarists.  If so, you can understand my reluctance to respond.
>
> David:
> Not meaning to "point fingers" your way, Rex, but...
>
> Perhaps we haven't read enough between the lines, or decyphered your
> latest code words, yet, Rex. Sometimes, you appear to want your words
> to be taken literaly (like your outburst to my reponse where I viewed
> one of your prior vague responses as apparently questioning the insincerity
> of one of my posts), and now, the above response of questionable meaning,
> where you have apparently left it as an excercise to the reader to
> attempt to understand what you mean above. And then, contrast this
> with our exchanges where you wanted to change the definition of
> the word "censorship" to fit your needs - with all of these contrasting
> writing styles, Rex, I must kindly ask - how should we interpret your
> posts ?
>
> Rex:
> >
> > Now, please pardon me while I go help a friend feed her hogs.  She's got a
> > nasty sow in there who bites at certain people.  I may have to take a 2 by 4
> > and whack the beast if she attacks me again, so wish me luck.
>
> David:
> Again, can you explain what you mean to get across to our valued
> list audience with the above comments ?
>
> Regards,
>
> David
> [log in to unmask]