PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rick Strong <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Oct 1998 07:24:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
James Crocker wrote:

>
>
> TIt is easy to just think that one static diet is the best over
> our whole lifespan, but we are living longer than the average h/g did.  I
> am not talking about total 180 degree changes, but maybe some changes in
> emphasis - red meat to fish, more fruits to more veggies, a little more
> nuts.
>
> The main question here is do our nutritional needs change as we age?
> Aren't the needs of a 14 yr old different as he/she gets to 30, 60, 90?
> And if so, shouldn't these changing nutritional needs be reflected in our
> dietary choices?
>
> ============================

  I think you raise an intersting question;  evolution may only "care" about
optimal heatlth through reproduction and rearing children to their own
reproductive phase.;  on the other hand,  there  may  have been some
selective pressures for healthy "elders" insofaras they were valuable to the
band or tribe for survival benefits gained from accrued knowledge and help
with child rearing.   The optimal diet for ensuring survival to to and
through the reproductive and child rearing phase may not be the best for
promotion of longevity.  excellent question. Rick

ATOM RSS1 RSS2