Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:32:18 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Mark,
Sunday, October 10, 1999, 9:26:09 PM, you wrote:
MR> >Another reason why you would want to do that is the IDE
MR> >channels only operate as fast as the slowest device on that
MR> >channel. By having the old slower HD with the fast new HD you
MR> >limit the speed to the old HD's, and negate any faster speed on the
MR> >new one.
MR> >Dale Laluk / [log in to unmask]
MR> This had validity a very long time ago when IDE devices and their on board
MR> controllers were new technology. However this has not been true for many
MR> many years. Modern IDE controllers ...since Win95 and earlier....have no
MR> problem making distinctions between IDE mode types. and with a modern
MR> controller you can mix any IDE devices on a channel without regard for mode
MR> type or age of the device.
It might be true, but I have an antique 96 Mb ALPA drive (ide) that
would be recognized if and only if it is a single drive on its
channel. No amount of jumper switching would solve the problem - it
simply refuses to be master or slave, freezing my PC.
(by the way, my MB is Abit BX6/2... modern controller, I think.)
Probably this is a problem not with a controller, which is good, but
with old drive which Integrated Electronics couldn't imagine there could
be more than one drive on the channel.
+=-.
| Max Timchenko [MaxVT]
| [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
| (ICQ) 238-6792
|
| Freelance website and graphics designer
| Max Webdesign at http://maxwd.hypermart.net
|
| Editor - Graphics artist
| NOSPIN group
+=-.
PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
visit our download web page at:
http://nospin.com/pc/files.html
|
|
|