RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Liza May <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:38:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Uh, oh. Things aren't looking too bright for fruitarians.

(Of course, one could always dismiss this study, published
today in the Lancet, as "just science.")

Love Liza


--
[log in to unmask] (Liza May)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Carbohydrates that are absorbed rapidly have a high
glycemic index, while those that are absorbed slowly have a
low glycemic index. In a large nutritional survey,
researchers analyzed the relationship between high glycemic
index carbohydrates and blood lipid levels. Among 1,420
participants, a high glycemic index was associated
significantly with lower HDL levels and was more closely
correlated with HDL concentration than even dietary fat
intake. The results suggest that, in terms of HDL
considerations, foods with a low glycemic index may be
better than foods with a high glycemic index.



Reference: Frost, G., Leeds, A. et al. 1999. Glycaemic index
as a determinant of serum
HDL-cholesterol concentration.   Lancet 353(9158):1045-1048.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2