Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:01:13 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Liza,
And if I remember correctly, except for bananas and the few dried fruits
that have been evaluated, most fruits have a reasonable glycemic index, more
reasonable than many grain products and potatoes.
david
----- Original Message -----
From: Burton, Kate <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: More Bad News for Fruitarians
> Hi Lisa,
>
> Not necesarily More Bad News for Fruitarians
>
> Would the fact that the people in the study most probably eat a wider
range
> of food, and may not be fruitarians, have anything to do with the study
> results? Does the body behave differently when eating only raw or mostly
> raw?
>
> Peace,
>
> Kate
>
>
> Reference: Frost, G., Leeds, A. et al. 1999.
> Glycaemic index as a determinant of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration.
> Lancet 353(9158):1045-1048.
>
|
|
|