RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Coffey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Oct 1998 14:28:24 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
In a message dated 10/17/98 5:28:08 AM Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<<
 Would you grant that it is kinda hard to talk with their non-success
 stories? ;)

--How many doctors tell about their non-successes? Howver, Charlotte Gerson
did discuss people who were not good risks for the treatment; also the fact
that the body will often respons once; sometimes twice; but if the person does
not continue to "feed" the body properly, it will not usually respond a third
time.

"Fool me once..." theory.

 There is no shortage of success stories. What there is a shortage of is
 rigorous documentation, third party verification/peer review. There is also
 a shortage of non-success stories--which often come to the fore after the
 testimonial (even one's own) loses its steam. Your story is exciting, but
 it just isn't the same as the statement, "A <particular diet> can cure
 cancer".
 --Of course, Kirt. Just like people thinking they can take care of their
deficiencies with vitmins and mineral supplements when once that vitamin or
mineral is taken out of its natural state it no longer has all the other
unknown factors in the whole plant food that work in synergy to provide
"nutrition."

FWIW:
Gerry

 Cheers,
 Kirt

 Secola  /\  Nieft
 [log in to unmask]

  >>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2