Tony:
>The work is extremely chaotically summarised on
>http://www.eclipse.co.uk/fresh/ecrbw.html.  The language is often very
>technical and difficult to understand and the whole thing really needs
>re-working into comprehensible English  -  but for those of you looking to
>have your perspective challenged its well worth a look.
>
>The authors are not looking for any personal financial gains, but purely to
>have the work published so that its initial far reaching hypotheses can be
>widely debated and further explored.  So they are looking for feedback so
>do post your comments onto this discussion group or contact direct at
>[log in to unmask]

YIKES!!! "Extremely chaotically summarized" is putting it mildly. If this
is an example of raw thought, I suggest a 100% cooked diet pronto. ;) Why
won't the authors sign their names anyway? Ah...nevermind. ;)

Seriously, like so many "far reaching hypotheses" it appears what we have
here is vocabulary salad which attempts to justify its intitial sentiment
by circular, spurious, and nearly idiotic leaps of logic and trampolining
(what word is beyond "leap"?) levels of abstraction. I would like to offer
my stab at "reworking it into comprehensible English":

Skip it.

Cheers,
Kirt

Secola  /\  Nieft
[log in to unmask]