Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 7 Mar 1999 12:31:26 -1000 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Alan:
>Here's a bit of interesting reading for you..and
>perhaps others
>
>http://www.veg.on.ca/newsletr/novdec96/evolution.html
Interesting, eh? If you think fluff like this impresses here you are mistaken.
Dropping Ms. Milton's name is very humorous indeed as her research has been
instrumental in establishing the difference between the various primates'
diets and their anatomy. She is a very rigorous and well-respected
researcher, whereas the authors perseverate on David Popovich, referenced
as below:
1996 Popovich, David. Interviews with graduate researcher in the Department
of Nutritional Sciences at the University of Toronto to prepare this
article (May, 1996).
Now that is a _reference_! Alan, you must love this kind of rigor, no?
If this is the kind of writing you base your beliefs on, why should you be
taken seriously?
But instead of a point-by-point rebuttal to the very non-informational
"article" perhaps Alan would like to join his non-meat-eating "Pleistocene"
homonoid buddies in showing us his 300cc braincase.
Cheers,
Kirt
Secola /\ Nieft
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|