Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 11:59:59 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
General Magic |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 12 Feb 99, at 16:36, Edna wrote:
> I have an old Gateway 486 full tower that I would like to upgrade to
> something like the Celeron 300A. It has a baby AT MB, and a 175Watt
> PS which may be limiting factors. I like the quality of the case
> however and would like to keep it if possible.
> What is the difference in the Celeron and the PII?
The Celeron cuts costs in a few ways -- SMP disabled, no/less L2 cache,
locked clock multipliers, reduced packaging and mounting hardware, smaller
cooling needs due to less heat production at rated speed. Intel is
trying to use these cost reductions to go after the low-end PC market.
> Do they have similar FPUs?
I've seen nothing to suggest that they differ in this respect.
> What would be a good MB option?
There are a few Slot 1 boards in mini-AT form factor. The one I have
is by Gigabyte, and I've found that the placement of DIMMs conflicts
with the lower front 3.5" drive bays of my tower case -- I had to mount
a couple of hard drives in bays underneath the power supply instead.
David G
PCBUILD's List Owner's:
Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|