BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
jcarriker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - Dwell time 5 minutes.
Date:
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:59:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
It's me again, the student on a mission. Once again thanks to all who
suggested sources for my Historic Preservation/Building Code Paper (still
researching, have yet to pick up the quill).

This book (Architecture Transformed: New Life for Old Buildings by Nora
Ricther Greer 1998) happened to fall into my hands, because I obviously
can't return dated order forms in time. But none the less related to my
paper topic.

The foreword stated (written by Hugh Hardy, FAIA): "Neither pure
conservation nor total restoration recognizes the realities of contemporary
building codes, lighting levels, environmental systems, security concerns,
or the needs of present-day activities". The rest of the foreword he argues
for adaptive reuse, because architects are torn between tradition and "stark
buildings" and because preservation "enriches our understanding of
ourselves".

I just was curious about opinions on the quote above (especially in regards
to his comment about building codes). Anyone care to sound off.

Jennifer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2