Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 1998 10:20:38 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi, Gary.
I read your response to Kathryn on PALEO just now and had a couple of
questions for you and other PALEO-ites.
I just got *Protein Power* in the mail yesterday and read a little last
night. Do you consider their plan paleo? I've been adding root veggies to my
diet the last few days and eating less beef -- and am considering doing a
four-day rotation plan because I seem to be hypersensitive to lots of foods
after many years of eating things it turns out I'm allergic to. I've also
been re-reading Crook on candida diets which *isn't* a LC plan at all -- lots
of warnings in there about the perils of fat and too much protein -- but I
have all the symptoms of candida. Anyway, I'm considering adding a small
amount of wild rice and buckwheat, possibly also quinoa and/or amaranth to my
basically LC diet. I seem to be moving from the sheer joy of unrestrained
Paleo -- eating a lot the way Ray ate in his seven-day menu in Neanderthin --
to a food plan that's a lot more like Sears or Eades. However, I'm also
following the candida plan in that I've cut out all fruit for now -- and
started feeling much better immediately as a result.
On the one hand I feel like I'm listening to my own body and that's good, and,
on the other hand, I feel confused because Audette, Crooks, the Eades, Sears,
Atkins, et al. all present plausible-sounding plans and I don't know how to
reconcile the differences!
Caryl
|
|
|