Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 02:02:07 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>I think faster
>bowel transit time associated with the evoluitonary diet is a logical
explanation
>ofr the lack of marked colon cancer in HG populaitons which consumed meat (at
>least I have never read of a HG population where it was significant. Rick
Hey, that's a good point: if hunter-gatherer populations eat lots of meat,
including cooked meat, and don't get cancer, then clearly it is something
else in the diet -- perhaps in combination with meat -- that causes the
cancer.
I'm glad this subject has come up, because it's been on my mind; "meat
causes colon cancer" is in the Top 10 List of objections that people raise
to the paleo diet.
One other possible defense is a "cost-benefit analysis" approach: if you
don't eat meat, you have to get your protein from somewhere else, such as
grains, which is even more carcinogenic. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks -- K.
|
|
|