Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 12 Nov 1998 20:18:39 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 11 Nov 98 at 16:11, Drew Dunn wrote:
> An ISP has several sites that get their Internet feed from them.
> To avoid expensive bandwidth issues, they desire to cache web
> requests to those sites. The problem is that we cannot determine
> exactly what CPU to put in these systems.
>
> Their existing caching server has (effectively) 3 T1's connected
> to it. It is currently at capacity. The system will become
> processor bound if any more T1's are connected. It has a PII-350
> with 512MB of RAM.
>
> The question at hand is, what processor would effectively handle
> four T1 connections? Would a single PII-450 be effective or will a
> dual PII-350 work? My calculations show that a PII-450 is roughly
> 23% faster than a PII-350. If we represent the pooled T1 lines as
> a total bandwidth of 100, I would need a processor that can handle
> a bandwidth of 133.33, but I show that a PII-450 would handle about
> 123. Is that true? Should it be more? Less? If the caching
> software forks processes to multiple processors, would a dual
> PII-350 be more or less effective than a single PII-450?
>
> One concern is that we deliver the best bang for the buck.
If a single PII-350 handles three lines, dual PII-350s should
handle at least four and maybe five. Dual 400s should do six, and
*might* get you to seven.
But are you sure that the process is CPU bound? Three T1s is only
about 4.65 Mb/s, not much more than you might see from a 10 Mb/s NIC.
I wouldn't think CPU would be your bottleneck.
Although you've got plenty of RAM, I'd suspect that hard drive I/O
might be a problem. If you're using IDE/EIDE, try switching to SCSI
(which lowers CPU utilization for I/O). Consider "striping" drives
to double or triple maximum bandwidth between drives and RAM. Uner
Win9x, you could fine-tune the amount of RAM used for disk caching;
your question about dual CPUs suggests NT, and I'm not sure if
there's an equivalent parameter there.
David G
Curious about the people moderating your
messages? Visit our staff web site:
http://nospin.com/pc/staff.html
|
|
|