Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 07:14:34 -0500 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think there was a feature on the front page of the Washington Post
Saturday Real Estate section a couple of months ago that dealt specifically
with lawsuits involving this building material. I didn't know what they
were talking about at the time, but it was some type of stucco-like
material that deteriorated very rapidly and was triggering suits by owners.
I think it must be the same stuff. It shouldn't be too hard to get the
issue is was in from the Post, either on-line or by phone.
Cherry Carnell wrote:
>For my son, who is a young Army officer stationed in Colorado and the
>owner of a house (now rented) in Savannah, GA that was constructed in
>the early '90's using that 'fake stucco' (it goes by the initials of its
>full name, which I forget), I wonder if any DIRTers have knowledge of
>ongoing actions or successful suits against builders for replacement of
>same when found to have caused moisture-related structural damage,
>especially in the state of Georgia?
>
Marilyn Harper
National Register of Historic Places
(which is in no way responsible for the content of this message)
|
|
|