BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"BP - Dwell time 5 minutes." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Marilyn Harper <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 07:14:34 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
"BP - Dwell time 5 minutes." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
     I think there was a feature on the front page of the Washington Post
     Saturday Real Estate section a couple of months ago that dealt specifically
     with lawsuits involving this building material.  I didn't know what they
     were talking about at the time, but it was some type of stucco-like
     material that deteriorated very rapidly and was triggering suits by owners.
      I think it must be the same stuff.  It shouldn't be too hard to get the
     issue is was in from the Post, either on-line or by phone.

     Cherry Carnell wrote:

     >For my son, who is a young Army officer stationed in Colorado and the
     >owner of  a house (now rented) in Savannah, GA that was constructed in
     >the early '90's using that 'fake stucco' (it goes by the initials of its
     >full name, which I forget), I wonder if any DIRTers have knowledge of
     >ongoing actions or successful suits against builders for replacement of
     >same when found to have caused moisture-related structural damage,
     >especially in the state of Georgia?
     >

     Marilyn Harper
     National Register of Historic Places
     (which is in no way responsible for the content of this message)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2