BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"BP - Dwell time 5 minutes." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Are BORATES poetically incorrect?
From:
mflynch <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Dec 1998 22:56:58 -0500
Reply-To:
"BP - Dwell time 5 minutes." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
If Two is too much
and Four is for naught,
will Sixes be dullards
and Sevens BORATES?

from "Numbers Don't Rime" by Math. E. Matics
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Follett <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, December 04, 1998 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: Are BORATES poetically incorrect?


>In a message dated 12/4/98 7:55:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
>writes:
>
>> If BORATES are poetically incorrect,
>
>BORATES are not poetically incorrect. I wanted to wake up another BP poet.
>Seems it worked. I can see another year of bad preservation poetry coming
our
>way.
>
>][<en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2