Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:08:02 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't. Explain how I don't. I know enough to understand this.
But thank you for telling me what I don't know. Nice attempt at shutting
me down, science dictator.
Godbless,
Anwar
Gary Orlando wrote:
>
> >Thanks for that.
>
> you're welcome.
>
> > I don't deny evolution because of a creationist belief,
> because evolution still does not deny God.
>
> a quick reality check denies God.
>
> >However, I think it falls
> short indeed and should not be called a fact.
>
> I don't care whether it's called a fact or not.
>
> >There are faults with it
> which includes the genetic info. problem at the core.
>
> There are faults with all theories that attempt to explain complex natural
> phenomena.
>
> > There is NO KNOWN
> PROCESS WHICH ADDS NEW INFO TO THE GENETIC CODE. Genetic changes can only
> be blamed on chemical or nuclear influences which are only known to
> damage the genetic code.
>
> you do not understand genetics.
>
> >This is why i say that the explanation of
> variation within species is a better explanation because species evolving
> into other species is NOT a fact, it is an unproven hypothesis with some
> definite holes in it.
>
> Only because you refuse to review the evidence.
>
> > And for something to be proven it can't have such holes in it.
>
> you wouldn't say that if you did not believe in God.
>
|
|
|