BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Are BORATES poetically incorrect?
From:
Dan Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - Dwell time 5 minutes.
Date:
Fri, 4 Dec 1998 08:23:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
In a message dated 12/4/98 7:55:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:

 > If BORATES are poetically incorrect,

BORATES are not poetically incorrect. I wanted to wake up another BP poet.
Seems it worked. I can see another year of bad preservation poetry coming our
way.

][<en


Hey!  My earlier efforts were were not bad preservation poetry.  They were just bad poetry.  My sig line is bad preservation poetry....

__________________________________________________
Dan Becker,  Exec. Dir.      Much like the Lorax who speaks
Raleigh Historic                    for the trees
Districts Commission          I speak for the buildings and
[log in to unmask]                 even for Mies...
            DISCLAIMER:     ...But my views may not be
                                            RHDC's

ATOM RSS1 RSS2