RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Mar 1999 10:24:28 +0200
Reply-To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit 7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> from "Jean-Louis Tu" at Mar 31, 99 10:06:33 am
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Jean-Louis Tu <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
P.S. From the same magazine, p.32, column 1:

==========begin translation===========

Consumers would be disappointed if they expect too much about
nutritional quality of organic foods. Granted, some studies have
proved that on average, some organic vegetables have a slightly higher
nutrient content. Professor Jean-François Lecerf, nutritionnist at the
Pasteur Institute in Lille, emphasizes: "Some studies are significant,
others not. But in each case, differences in nutritional value between
organic and conventional foods are very modest. It is more important
for health to have a balanced diet than to eat organic".

============end translation============


--Jean-Louis Tu <[log in to unmask]>

P.S. As Rex might say, organic foods don't necessarily have a higher
Brix than conventional ones (and they don't necessarily taste
better).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2