Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 27 Mar 1999 10:29:23 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jean-Louis Tu:
> > I think Duesberg's position is not that the HIV virus doesn't exist, but
> > that AIDS is not caused by HIV. I am not qualified to comment on his
> > arguments (but apparently he hasn't convinced so many scientists). I
> > am wondering if he is seropositive himself; if not, would he agree to
> > be injected with HIV?
Lucia:
> According to Dr. Turner, a part of the Perth group at the Royal Perth
> Hospital in West Australia, the evidence for HIV does not exist. That
> doesn't mean it might not exist, but there is no proof tht the antibody
> tests indicate HIV infection.
I disagree. If something has not been proven to exist, that most
certainly DOES mean that it might not exist. What is being found
might be just an experimental artifact of some sort. The Perth Group
seems, from what I've read, to be well aware of that possibility.
Carol
|
|
|