>> Tom:
>> Your correlation that the US has a high level of milk drinking,
>> with high levels of ostoporosis, does not prove a causal link.

Alan:
>This is exactly what the milk industry says. You don't happen to be
>funded by them by any chance?

This is exactly what any reasonable person says, Alan. Your logic in
drawing conclusions is lame. But, yeah, you can sure see it clearly. I
recently discovered that Tom Billings is a front for the dairy industry. He
just tries to fool people! <gag>

>> Tom:
>> And you should not let fundamentalist natural hygiene blind you. There
>> is very little in NH that is "scientific."


Alan:
>All the authors I have read quote numerous research reports. And the
>fact that people who practise it generally enjoy otherwise unknown
>health and wellbeing is a "scientific finding" in itself don't you
>think?

OK, Alan, if you pretend that your bias is one that is supported by
research then you better barf up "numerous research articles". For
starters, how about one that shows Tom is a puppet of the dairy industry?
Who are your "authors" anyway? You quip to another lister that they are
obviously just believing something they read, but you sound like a blind
man following the blind NH authors yourself, with your molecular words
(which JL has completely humbled you on but you are, yes again, blind to
it) and your rightous attitude.

As for the supposed health of NHers. Gawd, gaff, and guffaw. NHers have a
VERY poor track record anecdotally, and I challange you to show even a tiny
bit of "numerous research articles" that support your claim otherwize.

BTW, why don't fundamentalist NHers have their own mailing list, where they
can pat each other on the back for being so privy to the Truth, mock anyone
who disagrees (which is the rest of the world's population), and debate
whether or not nuts should be sprouted and whether or not Herbert Shelton
was actually God, or just the son of God.

Is it just me, or is this getting tiresome?

Cheers,
Kirt


Secola  /\  Nieft
[log in to unmask]