Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: List Problems
From:
ARWNY <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range.
Date:
Thu, 1 Jan 1998 22:55:57 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
In a message dated 97-12-29 14:00:50 EST, [log in to unmask] writes:

> That would be terrific!  It would at least keep the AOLers connected to the
> PL
>  list!

Actually, it will only keep the AOLers who were interested enough to jump the
G& E hurdle and actually subscribe to BP. I'll certainly welcome any newcomers
as long as they can put up with the wide scope of discourse and don't
complainabout using the DELETE key. A few BPers will have to put up with PL
messages, who would not otherwise be interested, and a few PLers who do not
use AOL will have to put up withthe redundancy. But if we don't get PL too
excited it should not be a hassle, I assume.

][<en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV