BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - Dwell time 5 minutes.
Date:
Thu, 8 Oct 1998 14:18:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
George Kramer sez:

>And by the way, here in the land of Wise Use we try to avoid "Preservation"
>in public discourse, as for most folks it equates with "tree-hugging
>environmental wacko...(fill in your  of choice.)  We scrupulously use
>"HISTORIC" whenever the "p" word is bandied about to keep physical violence
>to a minimum...great world, huh?

Am I not interpreting this right?  I take this to mean, George, that one
always uses the two words in tandem -- "historic preservation" -- to
distinguish oneself from the "tree-hugging environmental wacko"
preservation syndrome.  When speaking of buildings, never say simply
"preservation," in order to avoid bruises....

But it's moderately ok to say you do historic preservation?

_______________________________________________
Dan Becker,  Executive Director       "Conformists die, but
Raleigh Historic                                 heretics live on forever"
Districts Commission                                   -- Elbert Hubbard

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2