Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | BP - Dwell time 5 minutes. |
Date: | Thu, 8 Oct 1998 14:18:25 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
George Kramer sez:
>And by the way, here in the land of Wise Use we try to avoid "Preservation"
>in public discourse, as for most folks it equates with "tree-hugging
>environmental wacko...(fill in your of choice.) We scrupulously use
>"HISTORIC" whenever the "p" word is bandied about to keep physical violence
>to a minimum...great world, huh?
Am I not interpreting this right? I take this to mean, George, that one
always uses the two words in tandem -- "historic preservation" -- to
distinguish oneself from the "tree-hugging environmental wacko"
preservation syndrome. When speaking of buildings, never say simply
"preservation," in order to avoid bruises....
But it's moderately ok to say you do historic preservation?
_______________________________________________
Dan Becker, Executive Director "Conformists die, but
Raleigh Historic heretics live on forever"
Districts Commission -- Elbert Hubbard
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|