BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
sbmarcus <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Jan 1998 21:43:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
> >
> > that while my mind is ruled by gravity others' may not be. I should
have
> > known better, too, having lived for 37 years with a woman who reads
> > magazines back to front.
> >
> > Bruce
>
> Is there another way?
>
> -jc

It depends upon the magazine. After I made that remark I started to observe
my own magazine reading habits and realized that I have a different
methodology for each of my regular "reads" (At last count 37 magazines
regularly find their way into our household, some subscribed to, most
pass-throughs. I figure that on a monthly basis I read 73% more garbage
than an average 12 year old exposes itself to on television). The only
ones, in fact, that I read in the canonical manner are those I am
unfamiliar with, or don't peruse often enough to develop habits about.

Bruce

ATOM RSS1 RSS2