BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Fwd: Economics of preservation
From:
MDK10 <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - Telepathic chickenf leave no tracef. Turkey lurky goo-bye!
Date:
Tue, 12 May 1998 14:16:33 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
In light of our recent discussions on "Why Preserve," I wonder if you folks
might have any insight into this.

By the way, B.Lufkin just joined the BP list.  Welcome!

Mary Krugman
___________________________________________
Subj:   Economics of preservation
Date:   5/12/98 11:01:42 AM EST
From:   [log in to unmask] (B Lufkin)
Reply-to:       [log in to unmask]
To:     [log in to unmask]

I am pulling together information for our local nonprofit preservation
organization's annual business leaders' breakfast on the economics of
preservation.  I'm familiar with the many excellent Rypkema studies, the
National Trust publications and the recent New Jersey study.  Our local
input-output economists feel that there's not much validity to an economic
argument for preservation and that we should stick to cultural and
aesthetic arguments.  Any ideas?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2