Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:29:57 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Liza wrote:
>And heels make us walk kaBOOM kaBOOM kaBOOM - which is called in
>dance terminology "sinking into your hips" - which of course makes
>other parts go gaDOING gaDOING gaDOING - up and down, side to
>side, back and forth, swaying nicely.....
Excuse me, but I think heels make you walk TACK, TACK, TACK which
frequently reminds me to a machine gun. ;-) :-)
>Also interesting to me is the HUGE difference in what males and
>females can and cannot smell. I saw a recent study that revealed a
>huge list of specific smells that men simply CANNOT detect - but
>which are extremely strong positive or negative odors in a female
>nose. There was some discussion about how we females used (and in
>fact still use) smell as a primary means of assessing the health of
>a potential mate - a stinky guy has probably got unhealthy sperm.
Hm, I guess in the first place I'm choosing a partner by appearance,
the second is her mental development state (by talking with her)
and finally (if not offended up to this point) there comes the nose.
A friend of me says my flat smells like "me". But the same applies
to her flat, <g>. It definitely smells like her (and I like it).
Just to make a little point concerning raw foods here: She is eating
raw but makes exceptions (she tries to be raw vegan which obviously
doesn't work for her). So sometimes her smell is a little bit
sweaty.
>You men choose us by appearance, we choose you by smell.
Being in quite a good shape I'm not so sure if this applies. But
good looking male bodies are relative rare - so it is difficult
to find out what women are after.
It's said that men are looking at the lower part of a woman first,
the legs. If I'm wearing the male equivalent of hot pants I'm
getting the impression that it is the same for women. LOL
>I think most men
>simply have no concept - just not even the beginnings of the
>foggiest notion - what it is like for us when it comes to this issue
>of appearance.
<eg> better no concept than psychological problems. :-)
Best regards,
Stefan
|
|
|