Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - RAW-FOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
RAW-FOOD Home RAW-FOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: One from Lancet
From:
Rex Harrill <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:45:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Gerry Coffey wrote:

> ...Just know my intent is not to divide but bring together so we all might
> benefit...

> FWIW:;-)
> gerry

FWIW?  Well, all your comments are worth a lot in my opinion---this post happens
to be worth more than the average.

However, there was no need to list me with people who may have been  accused of
having an agenda.  Any hostility I encounter here seems only because my primary
question (yeah, but what about the 'quality'?) tends to knock the props out from
under the variety of dogma that currently dominates *this* roost.

But I take things in stride and feel I've learned much here.  I early on grasped
an insight that Alan is hopefully recognizing: take a stick and stir around in the
sarcasm and you'll find a smiley hidden here and there.  Also, sarcastic speakers
may be venting toxicity, but they're rarely stupid and their barbs can inspire the
target to rethink things.

Regards,
Rex Harrill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV