Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 May 1998 14:40:34 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Gregg Carter wrote:
> I'm having a hard time ignoring the research showing the negative impacts
> of transfatty acids and saturated fat on cardiovascular health.
> Eliminating the first, of course, is no problem on a Neandethin kind of
> program. But beef and pork are load with saturated fat. Right now, I'm
> eating fish (especially salmon and tuna), skinless chicken and turkey; and
> limiting my red meat to ground venison (which is low in saturated fat
> compared to beef); I also make my omlettes with only half the egg yolks--
> again guided by my concerns about saturated fat. Does this sound
> reasonable?
Read the material at http://home2.swipnet.se/~w-25775/index.htm
carefully. This business about saturated fat is complicated.
While many people will actually have improved blood lipids on a
Neanderthin sort of diet ("improved" according to currently
received medical opinion, that is), some will get the reverse
result. If you happen to be among the latter group (as I am)
then you must decide how concerned you want to be about
hypercholesterolemia, or try a different diet.
I have tried a different diet, and did succeed in getting a
substantial cholesterol reduction, but I also gained weight
(fat). Not good. So now I am back to a paleo-type program
rather like what you describe, except I don't get much venison.
I also use ground beef, but I de-fat it by boiling it and then
add olive oil and spices. It's actually quite good that way.
I'll get my blood lipids tested again in June.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|