Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:24:59 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Carol and Lucia!
LOL LOL LOL HA!! :D
Oh my gosh, this is hilarious!! You two would make a grreat
comedy team - especially because you are so SINCERE, and so
cheerful, and you got lost so honestly. It kind of snuck up
on you! lol lol. Reminds me of how confusedly out in the
ozone I generally feel most of the time.
> Carol:
> > > > I disagree. If something has not been proven to exist, that most
> > > > certainly DOES mean that it might not exist.
> > Lucia:
> > > well of course, it means it might not exist.... Still, scientifically,
> > > just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
> > Carol:
> > Of course not. But you said "That doesn't mean it might not exist"
> > which is something else entirely.
Lucia:
> To my mind, these two statements are the same:
> 1. just because you can't prove something that "doesn't mean it might not
> exist"
> 2. just because you can't prove something "doesn't mean it doesn't exist"
> we're in the twilight zone. not sure how I got here...
Liza:
HA!! HHHHeeeeelllpppp somebody, please! :D I'm hopelessly
lost! Logicians, please - Jean-Louis? Tom? Help! Help! lol
lol lol ...
Love Liza
--
[log in to unmask] (Liza May)
|
|
|