Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 14 Mar 1999 11:00:25 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nieft / Secola wrote:
> Very judicious of you to use the word _possible_. ;) If you actually read
> the related posts in the archives you can have little doubt about that
> particular "possibility". ;)
>
Thanks for the response, Kirt. Sure, I could see the rip-off, but I used
'possible' kinda in a legal sense. The original posts have a good bit of
judge, jury, & executioner type flaming and I, not having been present, stood
back. I'm emotional enough with my own battles without getting caught up in
other fights. But I can *feel* your pain. :)
> If NFL's book passes your scrutiny test, you will be delighted with "Raw
> Eating". It is entirely anecdotal and emotional...
I've not read either. Obviously, I won't touch NFL's work as long as the "P"
word is attached. Is "Raw Eating" online to your knowlege? I seem to
remember an essay online about 'Teach your children to eat raw' and there was
an Iranian name attached. Could it be the same work?
Thanks,
Rex Harrill
|
|
|