>
> Nieft / Secola wrote:
>
> > Melisa: 11/98 1995 1993 1991
> >
> > Blood Pressure: 90/60 100/60 100/70 110/80
> > Cholesteral: 216 186 170 153 (339 in 1/98)
> > Triglyceride: 47 49 40 NA
> > HDL: 75 67 NA NA
> > LDL: 132 112* NA NA
> > CHOL/HDL: 2.88 2.78 NA NA
> > LDL/HDL: 1.8 1.67* NA NA
> >
> > Myself:
> >
> > Blood Pressure: 100/64 100/60 100/70 110/70
> > Cholesteral: 181 175 167 182
> > Triglyceride: 34 70 99 NA
> > HDL: 56 63 NA NA
> > LDL: 118 104* NA NA
> > CHOL/HDL: 3.23 2.7 NA NA
> > LDL/HDL: 2.1 1.65* NA NA
Ellie:
>
> Here are some values for CHOL/HDL to compare. I've been all raw since
> Jan 95. Total CHOL range 132-219. A series of values for CHOL/HDL since
> Dec 95 were 2.9, in 96 1.7, 2.1, 1.9, 2.1, in 97 2.4, 2.9, 2.2, 2.5,
> 3.1, in 98 2.2, 2.4, 3.0, 3.0, 2.7
>
> 95 2.9 1 value only
> 96 2.0 avg
> 97 2.6 avg
> 98 2.7 avg
>
> In 96 I ate mostly raw fatty fish and chicken
> In 97 I began eating raw beef also.
>
P.S. Re: Melisa's 216 value. Here are some total cholesterol values I
had between '95 and '98
95' 178, '96 132, 167, 142, 188, '97 172, 202, 136, 209, 148, '98 219,
210, 175, 194, 178
'95 178 1 value only
'96 157 avg
'97 173 avg
'98 195 avg
My 219 value in '98 doesn't concern me. I see the average did increase
slightly as I began to eat more raw beef, including more marrow and some
lamb fat compared to the previous fatty fish. If you believe the "values
are higher because old bad fats are being flushed out", maybe that
accounts for the higher values? Who knows. the 188 value in '96 was the
day after eating 1 doz egg yolks. the 219 value in '98 was 1and 1/2 hr
after eating 4 TBS honey on an empty stomach.
My triglycerides:
'95 134 1 value
'96 71 avg of 3
'97 41 avg of 2 values
'98 69 avg of 2 values
Good values, I'd say. Lately I've increased eating some raw lamb fat
(not soft) and fatty beef, and noticed some indigestion. It doesn't
taste as delicious as marrow, and I'm trying to get Coleman to ship some
marrow into NYC.
My best, Ellie
|
