Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - RAW-FOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
RAW-FOOD Home RAW-FOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: overview of problems on raw food and explanations
From:
"Thomas E. Billings" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Dec 1998 09:25:04 -0800
Reply-To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
>>"Thomas E. Billings" wrote:
>> A cooked food consumer who teaches that other groups of people are
>> "mutants" or "inferior", is a bigot. A fruitarian/raw foods advocate who
>> teaches that cooked food consumers are mutants or inferior, is "passionate".

Rex Harrill <[log in to unmask]>
>I love humor, but sometimes have to admit I 'don't get it.'  The second sentence
>of this paragraph I got as a spoof.  The first is puzzling because it's so
>obviously true---the cooked consumer would quality as a bigot in anyone's book.
>Help me out, here.

Tom:
The second sentence is not a spoof. There really are fruitarians who say
cooked fooders are mutants/inferior. The excuse their supporters make
is that the miscreants are "passionate". [Are they "passionate bigots"?
:-) :-( ].

>>"Thomas E. Billings" wrote:
>> A cooked food scientist who claims that "fruit is just like Mother's
>> milk", "humans evolved as strict fruitarians" would be considered
>> a lunatic or a crackpot. A raw fooder who promotes the same, will
>> likely consider himself/herself a "scientific genius".

Rex Harrill <[log in to unmask]>
>Why would a fringe group dispute *anybody* who said "fruit is just like..." or
>"humans evolved as..."?  Isn't that their so-called party line?

Tom:
Once again, the analogies I made are real. They are not intended as humor,
though they are funny - in a sick kind of way. Fringe groups do indeed
promote crackpot, invalid theories like the ones identified above.

Rex Harrill <[log in to unmask]>
>I hate to be dense, but I really can't figure these two instances out.  OTOH, if
>this post, and the one before, are private humor, because of a private agenda,
>why not send them privately?  Obviously, the preceding post is so blatantly
>pro-cook propaganda that it might cause an unwary new reader to think that such
>as Pottenger's Cats thrived on cooked food, rather than dying out.

Tom:
See above; it is not humor. I am simply presenting analogies to encourage
folks in the raw community to critically evaluate the "party line"
and the behavior of those who promote it.

Tom Billings

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV