PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dean Kukral <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Apr 1998 11:22:16 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
-----Original Message-----
From: LaMont K. Bankes <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 1998 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] New CPU


<snip>
>
>AMD has made the decision to support the socket 7 user and not leave us
hanging
>like Intel.
>LaMont

I believe that Intel has patented the Slot 1 technology, so AMD, perhaps,
does not want to pay the license fees.

I have also heard that AMD and others are getting together to design
their own new slot technology, since the socket 7 is inadequate for
future designs.

I do not think that the implication that Intel does not care for its
customers simply because it went to Slot 1 is fair; new technology
is continually replacing old technology and nobody should know that
better than we pcbuilders.

Certainly, however, someone with a socket 7 motherboard who
is considering upgrading should consider  the cheaper
option of an AMD cpu if his/her motherboard will support it.

Dean Kukral
Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics
Wichita State University
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2