> If you read his writing, he is clearly not an anarchist. You could
> reasonably say he is "associated with anarchism," or that he "likes
> anarchist ideals." But he has said he is not sure if government should
> be eliminated altogether, which means he is not sure if he is an
> anarchist. As Emma Goldman put it, anarchism is a theory that states all
> forms of government are wrong and harmful.
>
> If you are not sure of government, you cannot call yourself an
> anarchist--indeed you cannot call yourself much of anything until you make
> up your mind.
True, but he has called himself an anarchist before. I forget who said it,
but "if you don't stand for anything you'll fall for everything."
Dan Carkner