PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Apr 1998 19:28:46 -0500
Reply-To:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
Quoted-printable
From:
Kris Shapar <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On 25 Apr 98 about Re: [PCBUILD] Year 2000, Jeffrey Delzer
<[log in to unmask]> had this to say:

> For those of us who have switched over to Win98's FAT32, an older
> 6.22/Win95 boot disk won't properly initialize the C: drive, will it? If
> not, what's the best course of action? I'd rather not go back to FAT16,
> if possible. TIA

Quite right, you can't use a FAT16-formatted system disk to boot a
FAT32 drive. But the newer versions of Win98 allow you to check your
system for millenium-bug susceptibility; read your Release Notes to
see if your version allows this.

Kris Shapar

ATOM RSS1 RSS2