Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Aug 1997 20:50:55 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 03:38 PM 8/12/97 +0800, you wrote:
>I think the discussion below relates to the Neanderthin concept of
>only eating things you could eat in the wild. So what do people
>think? Are domesticated almonds (of which I normally consume large
>quantities) of a different category than wild? Are our bodies set up
>to recognize those proteins, or are we setting ourselves up? I do
>have to limit my consumption when I want to lose weight, so I would
>say it's not at all clear...
>
>Molly NiDana
That's a good point; to what point do we want to carry the 'no domesticated
stuff' model? For instance, I eat broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower,
cucumbers... these are different from their wild ancestors, I'm assuming!
But domesticated almonds don't contain the amounts of cyanide that would be
hazardous to a human eating them. Their other properties we can certainly
discuss :D
Corbie
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
http://www.radix.net/~lindo
I am *NOT* a rabid feminist! I had my shots last year.
|
|
|