Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 13:02:22 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Mike Devonshire wrote:
> Re: Roche design for Jewish Museum
>
> Thank you Mr. Gray. Not only is the exterior a travesty, but what was
> destriyed on the interior is enough to bring tears to anyone's eyes. I
> thought I was the only one who barfed every time I passed the thing.
I thought that the original interior of the Jewish Museum was destroyed
long before the addition was built. Certainly, when I visited the place,
years ago, I was surprised to see so little of the original architectural
fabric of the interior. But I suppose this is typical of the renovations
of the era when the building was converted from mansion to museum, and
really a separate issue from the addition.
So, what makes the addition a "travesty"? Keep in mind that all I have
seen are small blurry pictures in the newspaper.
Larry Kestenbaum
|
|
|