RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jul 1997 22:22:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Bob:
>I believe Bruno & I believe he personally observed FACTS, so your
>conclusions re GCB are probably correct.  And I still consider folks,
>including Burger, innocent til proven guilty.

Martha:
>>That's very virtuous, but then why not extend the same courtesy to
>>the president, first lady and attorney general?

Bob:
>I did; hadn't you watched them proving themselves guilty by talk &
>action for years??  :-)

Why will you not concede the same standard for G.C.Burger? - Surely he
has more than proven himself guilty by his "talk and action for years"?
It looks to me that you are applying one standard for Burger (not
guilty until convicted in a court of law) and another for the
politicians you have taken a dislike to. (guilty no matter what)
Unless, of course, you want to tell me that all your political
observations are "personally observed facts"? ;-) BTW, watching the
"Clinton Chronicles" (and other conspiracy videoes) and watching Waco
on CNN do do not qualify as "personally observed facts". :-)

Best, Peter
[log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2