Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Soybeans strike back
From:
"John C. Pavao" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 1997 11:39:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Well, it's been awhile since I've read my copy of Neanderthin, but I'm
pretty sure that if a food requires any processing at all to be edible,
it's out.  I'll go back and read it again.  People probably didn't evolve
eating foods that needed cooking to be edible; cooking is a fairly recent
(10,000yrs?) thing.

Take care,
John Pavao

----------
I don't understand your argument. The needed "processing" is just cooking.
How
could a cooked-paleo eater refuse a food on the basis that it requires
cooking?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV