Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - RAW-FOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
RAW-FOOD Home RAW-FOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: documentation (was Re: cancer
From:
Janis Callen Bell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:18:26 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
At 10:38 10/17/98 EDT, you wrote:
>The Gerson therapy is quite well documented, however I don't believe it has
>been published yet.
>Ray

There's a difference between documenting case studies and doing a controlled
study where many variables are accounted for.  But, the real issue is:  why
isn't there any funding for documentation and studies of alternative
therapies?  And why does the FDA make it so damned hard for those who do
want to get approval for alternative techniques?  I'm thinking of the people
doing ozone therapy who finally got through the hurdle of animal studies,
did outside of the US studies with humans, and still can't get the FDA to
approve a study inside the US for humans -- even though their other studies
have gotten cures for AIDS in the order of 85% and higher?  Is it because of
the $$$ interests running the pharmaceutical companies?  :-) Wouldn't
surprise anyone, eh?

Janis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV