Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:18:26 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 10:38 10/17/98 EDT, you wrote:
>The Gerson therapy is quite well documented, however I don't believe it has
>been published yet.
>Ray
There's a difference between documenting case studies and doing a controlled
study where many variables are accounted for. But, the real issue is: why
isn't there any funding for documentation and studies of alternative
therapies? And why does the FDA make it so damned hard for those who do
want to get approval for alternative techniques? I'm thinking of the people
doing ozone therapy who finally got through the hurdle of animal studies,
did outside of the US studies with humans, and still can't get the FDA to
approve a study inside the US for humans -- even though their other studies
have gotten cures for AIDS in the order of 85% and higher? Is it because of
the $$$ interests running the pharmaceutical companies? :-) Wouldn't
surprise anyone, eh?
Janis
|
|
|