Martin Finne wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > > Appropriate range?  Whose range is that?  Do we need 60 grams of
> > > protein....
> <snip>
> > > ...  If you like, I'll take this conversation private?  I imagine
> > > the rest of the list is getting tired of this.
> > I would rather drop this at this point altogether.
> >
> > Ilya
>
> I am getting a bit frustrated. I have been told that the english cow
> disease is caused by proteins.
> I am also a bit frustrated of food declarations stating x% proteins.
>
> How many of these are toxic ? I am sure that these 60 grams ehas to be
> others than casein and gluten, which I am perfectly well without. Even the
> proteins that makes cannibals shaky ( as in Kreutzfeldts or in English cow
> disease) will probably not be of any great nutrition value.
>
> I accept the need to generalize, but to set a measur for the need for
> proteins are similar to set a measure for the need for metal. We need lots
> of different metals but we manage well without quicksilver or plutonium in
> our bodies. Other metals becomes poisonous when we get to much.
>
> To me this debate has become a bit meaningless.
>
> Martin Finne.