PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Nieft / Secola <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Oct 1997 06:22:02 -0900
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Karl:
>        So should I bother at 275, or is it just too fat to consider?

Surely you've read in the evo-psych stuff that across cultures both women
and men consider the following when looking for a mate:

#1] kindness
#2] intelligence

and then there is a split

#3] men want "physical attractiveness"
#3] women want power/resources and a willingness to share it

"physical attractiveness" is farther down the list for women. The real
question is: is there someone you are attracted (ie who is kind enough and
intelligent enough) to enough to motivate you to extend yourself to
her--even at the risk of being rejected? When there is, you will.

Cheers,
Kirt

Secola  /\  Nieft
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2