Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sun, 17 Oct 1999 14:19:30 -1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Robert:
>After reading the Clara Davis report. I'm not sure it proves anything
>except children had preferences day by day. It does not support
>instinctive eating of raw nor non raw foods.
Yes, that was my point.
>She gave both cooked and raw and the children ate
>both. They ate foods that supported their health and growth and
>nutrition as well as they could measure. In most cases there was no
>preference of one over the other.
Hmmm. There were clear preferences documented.
>There were only foods presented that were nutritious.
Yet dairy and grain were included, which instinctos consider _very_
unhealthy, not nutritious.
>The 3 children ate various amounts of different food groups. If we
>as adults were presented with only the foods the children were, we
>probably could eat what we preferred from the list and sustain our
>weight and nutritional requirements. Especially sense there were no
>pizza's, coffee nor ice cream or other favorite non nutritional foods
>presented. Try the same experiment today by giving your children vegges
>and candy and see what the results are.
>I have already been there.
And it may be the same with instincto. That is, the results have as
much to
do with avoiding grains, dairy and junk food as it does with the
rawness
and/or the one-food-at-a-atime rule. Who knows?
Cheers,
Kirt
Secola /\ Nieft
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|