Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri, 13 Feb 1998 08:54:32 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Forwarded from Nature's First Law
>-------------------------------
>For anyone interested in the anthropological side of diet, the following is a
>paper that further destroys the idea that we are meat-eaters.
I wonder what source David Wolfe plagiarized the above from? :-)
Perhaps it is plagiarized from materials from the Creationist Institute
in San Diego that Wolfe mentioned in an earlier essay? (Just an educated
guess.)
Someone already posted a brief criticism of the many factual errors and
mis-representations in Wolfe's essay, to the raw list.
I propose a new nickname for Wolfe: in recognition of his plagiarism and
promotion of junk science, I nominate Wolfe for the nickname:
David "The Creationist Plagiarist" Wolfe. :-) :-) As NFL likes slogans,
here's a new one for them: "Plagiarism is Nature's First Law". :-) :-)
What is the next project for super-scientist David Wolfe? I know: he
will write an essay that proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the
earth is flat! :-)
P.S. If Wolfe really is trying to become a lawyer, I wonder what the
State Bar would say about his plagiarism? What would the University
of San Diego think about that? Interesting questions!
P.S. #2 I notice in reading fruitarian writings that logic is often missing,
and the thinking is very UNclear. This is not restricted to Wolfe/NFL,
though they are prime examples of UNclear thinking. I remember when I was a
fruitarian, and can tell you that I did not think clearly then, and I see the
same thing in many current promoters of fruitarian diets. One wonders if the
diet is a cause or symptom here...
Regards,
Tom Billings
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|