Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - RAW-FOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
RAW-FOOD Home RAW-FOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: On Form and Actuality
From:
Don Wiss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Sep 1997 19:44:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Ward Nicholson wrote:
>The basic and easy way to show anti-evolutionist arguments for the
>creationist ideas they are is simply to point out that if you believe there
>are different fossil forms, and you believe the dating methods are in any
>way accurate to even a rough level, then you have to account for how all
>these different fossil forms got there. Ask them what they propose leading
>to the different fossil forms if they don't believe earlier ones gave rise
>to later ones somehow.

I was once in an argument with a creationist. I pointed out the dating of
things. He replied that god created everything to make them look old. I
decided not to waste my time arguing.

Don.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV